Stupid Terms in Photography

Depth of field to others……"Oh you mean like a football field?" "Like a field that has flowers in it?" ISO….I SO sassy

love u guys.

Ha! Tell em folks. SO fun to watch!

Sdp.io? Now You will explain me the tiny url lingo which never change. Lol, JK. Variables , parameters are just numbers get over it , nice video

Just beginning photography (haven't bought a ILC yet) and this video was the best! I was about to look up terms and would probably find some dead serious explanation that makes it look like the term is the best, everything is perfect with it etc. but now I got another view on things. That the terms aren't the best but that how it's done…

"Shutter the hell up!"🤣🤣😃😂😅

I was all ready to get on board with "Exposure Time" and then you had to go there.
Aw naww.

All of these terms make sense to me because that is what I was taught. Kinda like the metric system and U.S customary units of measurement. The U.S system really makes no sense but, its what I was taught so I understand it.

Depth of field is used outside of photography (computer graphics and rendering). Sorry, this one already leaked so you can't take it back lol!

So, you're saying people don't know their √(2) times table?

I love this beautiful video

You guys are idiots and I LOVE YOU FOR IT!!

Love it! Yes!!!!!

Exposure time… Shudder! lol

you two are hilarious. Love this humor on a Friday morning.

I never even realized DOF makes no ffing sense in english until recently. Finnish word translates directly "sharpness zone". Then I was trying to write something in english and started to suspect I forgot a term because field makes no sense here. Like it could be field of sharpness or depth of sharp area but depth of field is just agriculture.

URL for book?

Disagree with your ideas for the first time. Shutter speed is the speed of shutter. F no. is the denominator so it has to be inverse of the aperture. Depth of field is not a scientific term. Exposure Triangle is theoretical and practical always differ. Nobody stops anybody from making and believing theories. Love your work❤. Chelsea shouting iso😂😂😂

Ironic… trying to sell a book to people who come to Youtube becasue they want to watch a video instead of reading.
I needed this video today, good laugh. Now back to learning how to count in square roots of 2… it's like trying to explain the metric system to Americans…

lol you guys are hilarious, my favorite video / episode

Love you guys

"Stops" is a good term.
(If you have a lens that clicks into position at the the randomly-assigned stops so that, as you turn it, it – erm – stops?)

Lmao, now this is my favorite video haha 👍

Hahahaha I'm dyin over here.

I LOVEE YOU GUYSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!

Hahahaha 👌 so true!

LOL, love you guys. I really want a Tony & Chelsea bobblehead for my car! Please? (Hell, I might even put one on a drone!)

Very funny thanks!

"I shoot raw"?

For same reason my brain always defaults to "plane of focus" rather than depth of field

Maybe if you were dyslexic like me, many of those terms would make sense.

Aperture is the diameter of the iris, and is expressed as f/[number] where f is the focal length, so "f/16" means the diameter of the iris is 1/16 of the focal length.

So f/16 is a smaller number than f/8, as something divided by 16 is half that thing divided by 8

Depth-of-field should be called depth-of-focus

Good but you left out ASA, Hot Shoe, Guide Number, Watt Secondn Noise and Joules. Oh and what about the Inverse Square Law?

love you guys

Awesome vid!

Great video – so many good points you make here 🙂

I like this video, but I'm not sure why I felt like you guys are trying to burn someone in the ass… 🤔

2:30 – because it's the focal length divided by diameter for front lens element.

On a zoom lens, an f-stop can change even with the same size opening.

Enjoying your book. And, thanks for the videos. A bit of tongue-in-cheek anger helps to mitigate the more serious concepts.

Eye-so-stupid for leaning shutter speed quickly, f I stop, then I no longer be exposure of myself, in triangle!

ISO is not part of exposure in digital photography.

THANK YOU SO MUCH!!!! FINALLY ….SOMEONE ELSE WHO SAID IT!
+

ITS THE REASON jARED DOES NOT LIKE TONY….HE HAS NOTHING TO PROVE. ……………………LIKE ME. 🙂

I am so happy. Irrational taxonomies bug me on a daily basis, and these photography terms annoy me almost as much as musical notation does. Hooray for Tony and Chelsea for saying what we all know.

Love it!! Thank you, you make me smile!!

Love it!!!! You guys are great.

I've watched maybe 100 of your videos, and this is the best one yet. No hate here guys, keep it up and keep having fun.

You guys are great.